Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Christopher Lancaster v. USDC-CARIV
as 17-73003
:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
UNKNOWN MALE NURSE, individual & official capacity, PRICE, individual, PRICE, Nurse-official capacity and others
DAUGHERTY et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY and LABMD, INC.
Defendant:
JOEL P. ADAMS , DAVID J. BECKER , ROBERT J. BOBACK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Michael Daugherty, et al v. Joel Adams, et al
as 17-11300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY and LABMD, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOEL P. ADAMS, DAVID J. BECKER, ROBERT J. BOBACK and others
Jefferies LLC v. WTW Investment Company LTD et al
as 3:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
WTW Investment Company LTD, Jefferies LLC, Mark E Trivette and others
Not Yet Classified:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chien v. Clark et al
as 3:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Andrew K Clark , William K Grogan , LeClairRyan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Daugherty et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Daugherty and LabMD, Inc.
Defendant:
Joel P. Adams, David J. Becker, Robert J. Boback and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Freeman et al v. Invictus Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv07400
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Freeman and Cynthia Freeman
Defendant:
Invictus Capital, LLC, John Carris Investments LLC, George Carris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Clark
as 14-2962
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremiah K. Clark
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2013cv00845
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-20008
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Clark and James K. Clark
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
