Cases
Robert Reed v. Michael, et al.
as 23-6656
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL, a/k/a Mike, U.S. Marshal, PHILLIP CORNELIOUS, D.C. Superior Court Agent, JEQUAN JACKSON, U.S. Parole Case Analyst and others
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant: PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, ERICK HELENIHI, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Michael, et al. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00100
Defendant: Michael, et al., Mike, Phillip Cornelious and others
Plaintiff: Robert Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. HELENIHI et al
as 2:2022cv03576
Petitioner: ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent: ERICK HELENIHI doing business as U.S. PAROLE EXAMINER, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA doing business as U.S. PATROLE DIRECTOR, JEQUAN JACKSON doing business as U.S. PAROLE ANALYST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reed, Corp Sole v. Whitmer et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff: Robert Andrew Reed, Corp Sole doing business as Robert Andrew Reed
Defendant: Chris Whitmer, Erick Helenihi, April Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 2:2022cv01814
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANDREW REED CORP. SOLE doing business as ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant: CHRIS WHITMER, ERICK HELENIHI, KEVIN PITROS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nixon v. State of Maryland Department of Public Saftey and Correctional Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv00442
Plaintiff: Lonnie D Nixon
Defendant: State of Maryland Department of Public Saftey and Correctional Services, K Landerkin, R Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?