Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Russell Johnson v. Woo K. Lee et al
as 2:2017cv09121
Defendant:
DOES and Woo K. Lee
Plaintiff:
Russell Johnson
Hyatt v. Matal
as 17-2018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and JOSEPH MATAL, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Synopsys, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
Synopsys, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Intervenor_defendant:
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. LEE et al
as 2:2017cv01939
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CHANG K. LEE and 777 ASK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USSEC v. Larissa Ettore, et al
as 17-55290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
LARISSA O. ETTORE, CLAYTON K. LEE and LOLITA GATCHALIAN
In re: Centen
as 16-2739
Appellee:
MICHELLE K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
In re: COREY CENTEN, NILESH PATEL and PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC.
Swyers v. United States Patent & Trademark Office et al
as 1:2016cv01042
Defendant:
United States Patent & Trademark Office, William R. Covey, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Swyers and Matthew H. Swyers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv01036
Plaintiff:
Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hyatt v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 2:2016cv01490
Plaintiff:
Hyatt, American Association for Equitable Treatment, Inc. and Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office and Michelle K Lee
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
