Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MATTA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2026cv09002
Plaintiff:
MARIO MATTA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
THIRD CAPITAL GRANTOR TRUST et al v. CONSUMER RECOVERY TEAM GRANTOR TRUST et al
as 9:2026cv80686
Plaintiff:
Sanjiv Singh Matta, THIRD CAPITAL GRANTOR TRUST, Sanjiv Matta and others
Defendant:
Edward Gregory Steadman, CONSUMER RECOVERY TEAM GRANTOR TRUST and E. Gregory Steadman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01193
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Matta et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03998
Plaintiff:
Julio Matta
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MATTA v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2026cv22044
Plaintiff:
ADEL MATTA
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Matta v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2026cv22045
Plaintiff:
ADEL MATTA
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01125
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sharon Thomas v. InterMark Management Corporation
as 26-1156
Plaintiff:
SHARON THOMAS
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, ANDREA MAYS, COLLETTE MATTOX, In her individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
