Cases 1 - 10 of 28
(PC) Sierra v. Covello et al
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kendrick v. Covello et al
as 2:2023cv02978
Plaintiff:
John F Kendrick and John F. Kendrick
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, K. Rodgers and T. Norgaard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Anderson v. Halbritter et al
as 2:2023cv02260
Plaintiff:
William B Anderson and William B. Anderson
Defendant:
S. Halbritter, K. Rodgers, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sierra v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, N. Costa, K. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rouser v. Allison et al
as 2:2021cv02206
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Patrick Covello, K. Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Fuqua v. Raak, et al
as 21-15492
Defendant / Appellee:
HALL, Sgt., THOMAS, Chaplain, COCA, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
RODGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92133
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES K RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Ponder
as 4:2020cv01614
Plaintiff:
Warren K. Rodgers
Defendant:
Officer Ponder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
