Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roscoe Chambers v. Poyner, et al
as 19-55280
Defendant:
FCI DOCTOR, ALLEN, HARDY, Senior Deputy and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE ESQUETINI, LEEN, POYNER, USP Health Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Allen, et al
as 18-55256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEN, Chief Health Physician, in official capacity, HARDY, Senior Deputy, USP McCreary Orthopedic Doctor, POYNER, USP Health Administrator and others
Roscoe Chambers v. Allen, et al
as 18-55204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLEN, Chief Health Physician, in official capacity, HARDY, Senior Deputy, USP McCreary Orthopedic Doctor, POYNER, USP Health Administrator and others
Roscoe Chambers v. Dr. Allen et al
as 5:2017cv01353
Defendant:
Dr. Allen, FCI Doctor, Dr. Hardy and others
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Julie K. Schneider v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Julie K. Schneider
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
In Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation
as 2:1991cv03015
Plaintiff:
Evenson, et al , Barbara Alvarado , Ruth Jilg and others
Intervenor:
Cowles Publishing Co
Defendant:
E I duPont de Nemours and Company , - General Electric Company , UNC Nuclear Industries Inc and others
Mediator:
Gary Neil Bloom
Amicu:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
