Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Clarence Howard v. Avila, et al
as 14-16105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE EUGENE HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
AVILA, K. TODD, R. BENNETT and others
Umoja v. Todd et al
as 1:2013cv00396
Plaintiff:
Piru Umoja
Defendant:
K. Todd, G. Santiago and E. Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fischer v. Algers, et. al.
as 2:2012cv02595
Plaintiff:
Michael Fischer
Defendant:
Dawn T. Algers, Paul Elias, Dante Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 2:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Hopkins
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Z Berg, Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Givens v. Soltanian et al
as 2:2012cv00687
Plaintiff:
David E Givens
Defendant:
Soltanian, L. D. Zamora, Lawrence C. Fong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Gould v. City of Newport News, Virginia
as 10-6893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN GOULD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA, ARTISHA K. TODD, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Newport News, VA and CHARLES E. HADEN
Barron v. Martel et al
as 2:2010cv01567
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. Barron
Defendant:
M. Martel, Smith, Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould v. City of Newport News, Virginia et al
as 2:2010cv00286
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Gould
Defendant:
City of Newport News, Virginia, Artisha K. Todd and Charles E. Haden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOULD v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS et al
as 1:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
KELVIN GOULD
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS CITY JAIL, HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelvin Gould v. City of Ne
as 10-6205
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELVIN GOULD
Respondent - Appellee:
CITY OF NE, JEFFREY COLE ROUNTREE, Attorney, TYRONE C. JOHNSON, Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
