Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BALLARD v. MORALES et al
as 5:2021cv00138
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSE MORALES, DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, LT CLUBPER and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Constant v. DTE Electric Company, et al
as 20-1514
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCI J. GRANT, MICHAEL DAVID WARREN, JAMES M. HAMMOND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH CONSTANT
Hjalmar Rodriguez v. Edward Burnside
as 20-11218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ and HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD H. BURNSIDE, MARY GORE, Nurse,GDCP, DAVID BUTTS, Medical Director, GDCP and others
RODRIGUEZ v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, BRUCE CHATMAN, CELLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forte et al v. Austin Bridge & Road, L.P.
as 2:2012cv00644
Plaintiff:
Karen Forte and Kevin Forte
Defendant:
Austin Bridge & Road, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Corrion et al v. Hood et al
as 2:2011cv14916
Plaintiff:
John Corrion and Nancy E Corrion
Defendant:
Karen Fort Hood, Mark J. Cavanagh and Michael J. Kelly
Maurice Neal v. Karen Hood, et al
as 10-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE NEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN FORT HOOD, EDWARD EWELL, JR. and 3RD JUDICIAL COURT OF MICHIGAN
Neal v Hood et al
as 2:2009cv13168
Plaintiff:
Maurice Neal
Defendant:
Karen Fort Hood, Edward Ewell, Jr and 3rd Judicial Court of Michigan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Jones v. Michigan, State of et al
as 4:2008cv13388
Petitioner:
Leslie Jones
Respondent:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Bar Association, Wayne County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
