Cases 1 - 7 of 7
WALKER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13846
Plaintiff:
GARY WALKER and THE ESTATE OF KATHERINE WALKER, DECEASED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11630
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE WALKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv18409
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WALKER, JR. and KATHERINE WALKER
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2016cv01656
Plaintiff:
Katherine Walker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walker et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09306
Plaintiff:
Katherine Walker and John Walker
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Matthews, et al
as 11-3057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANA (COLLIS) MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUG MATTHEWS, Barton County Attorney and KATHERINE WALKER, Asst. Barton County Attorney
Martin v. Matthews et al
as 6:2010cv01246
Plaintiff:
Deana Martin
Defendant:
Doug Matthews and Katherine Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
