Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Showell v. Mahally et al
as 3:2017cv00517
Petitioner:
Bobby Showell
Respondent:
Lawrence P. Mahally, Kathleen Kane and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIERRA v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv00001
Petitioner:
ANTONIO SIERRA
Respondent:
KATHLEEN KANE, NANCY GIROUX and JACK DANERI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trollinger v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2016cv02274
Petitioner:
Michael Trollinger
Respondent:
Tammy Ferguson and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parno v. Kane et al
as 1:2016cv01949
Plaintiff:
Glenn A. Parno
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane, Renee Martin, David Peifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carusone v. Kane et al
as 1:2016cv01944
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carusone
Defendant:
Kathleen Kane, Renee Martin, David Peifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurill v. Tritt et al
as 1:2016cv01862
Petitioner:
Lamar Spurill
Respondent:
Superintendent Tritt, Michelle Henly, Kathleen Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OPENPITTSBURGH.ORG v. WOLOSIK et al
as 2:2016cv01075
Plaintiff:
OPENPITTSBURGH.ORG and JAKE WITMER
Defendant:
MARK WOLOSIK , JOHN P. DEFAZIO , RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRASQUILLO v. FORMA et al
as 2:2016cv03880
Petitioner:
MARIA CARRASQUILLO
Respondent:
JOANNE FORMA and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
