Cases 1 - 10 of 502
BEAUCHAMP v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
KELLEY M BEAUCHAMP
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marleis Trover v. Craig Oglesby, et al
as 24-1733
Plaintiff:
MARLEIS TROVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of DONALD D. GADDIS
Defendant:
CRAIG OGLESBY and DUSTIN KELLEY
Gabrys v. Will County et al
as 1:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
Richard Gabrys
Defendant:
Will County, Will County Sheriff's Office, Mike Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Virgil Kelley v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1587
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL L. KELLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Mosley v. CCC Center of Correctional Concern et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
CCC Center of Correctional Concern, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Big Daddy Cab Company et al
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Big Daddy Cab Company, THC Cab Company, Cue Cab Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Echelberger v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Jared Echelberger
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Echelberger v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Jared Echelberger
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Sarah Kerley, Erin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SOWDERS v. BYRNE et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
BARRY JUNIOR SANDERS and BARRY JUNIOR SOWDERS
Defendant:
ANDY BURNE, MIKE ISOM, KELLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arzola v. ALDI, Inc.
as 1:2023cv16659
Plaintiff:
Kelley Y. Arzola
Defendant:
ALDI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
