Cases 1 - 10 of 1,025
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilcrist v. Middleton et al
as 8:2024cv02507
Plaintiff:
ADwan Cortavius Gilcrist
Defendant:
Cameron Middleton, Greenwood Police Department, T.J. Chaudoin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Capps v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health et al
as 0:2024cv02461
Plaintiff:
Richard Capps
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard, Facility Administrator, ET. AL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant:
Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Oladokun v. Kelly
as 5:2024ct03091
Plaintiff:
Oladayo Oladokun
Defendant:
Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Wade
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner:
Lamar Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly Clark v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6211
Petitioner:
KELLY JAMES CLARK, JR.
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
