Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Muhammed v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv01022
Petitioner:
John Allen Muhammed
Respondent:
Loretta K. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Branch v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00138
Petitioner:
Lawrence Branch
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Epps et al
as 4:2006cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Jordan and Kelvin Jordan
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powers v. Epps et al
as 2:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elliot Powers
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Brown v. Epps et al
as 2:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Xavier Brown and Xavier Brown
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Kelly v. Quarterman
as 07-70003
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALVIN ANDREW KELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Powell v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00059
Petitioner:
Paul Warner Powell and Paul Warner Powell
Respondent:
Loretta K. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Howard v. Epps et al
as 3:2007cv00010
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Howard, Jr. and Eddie Lee Howard, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darick Walker v. Loretta Kelly
as 06-23
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARICK DEMORRIS WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Bell v. Kelly
as 06-22
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD NATHANIEL BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
