Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Trevor Mohammed v. Kenneth Beaver
as 21-7404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TREVOR MOHAMMED
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH BEAVER, RONDAL PRESTON TOWNSEND, a/k/a Rondal Townsend, PAMELA CHAPMAN and others
Jonathan Newell v. North Carolina Industrial Commission
as 21-7094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, PHILIP A. BADDOUR, JR., KIMBERLY D. GRANDE and others
TYLER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT DETENTION CENTER, MICHALE WALLACE JORDAN, ELIZABETH PALAVEOINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Schnebelen v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6209
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SCHNEBELEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSH STEIN, North Carolina Attorney General, MIKE SLAGLE, Mountain View CI Superintendent and ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of Department of Public Safety, this respondent was initially named as other Kenneth Beaver
Curtis Shuler v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 20-7228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS D. SHULER
Defendant / Appellee:
R. JOHNSON, KENNETH BEAVER, DENNIS SELZER and others
Shuler v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Dennis Selzer, Kenneth Beaver, Kenneth Poteat and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Small et al
as 5:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Randy Shores, Wendy Kelley, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammed v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mohammed
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Christopher Murray and Kenneth Beaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAISON EL v. BEAVER et al
as 1:2018cv00960
Respondent:
Kenneth Beaver, NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF and JOSH STEIN
Petitioner:
STEVEN FAISON EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Faison El v. Beaver et al
as 3:2018cv00615
Respondent:
Kenneth Beaver, North Carolina, State of and Josh Stein
Petitioner:
Steven Faison El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
