Cases 1 - 10 of 11
EL et al v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
NOBLE CHRISTO EL, TRE N VISCO, LEONARD LUDWIGSEN, JR and others
Defendant:
DAVID KELSEY (in his individual and official capacity) doing business as DAVID KELSEY, WARDEN, K. BROWN, "JOHN" CHARLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv14709
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parrish
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARRISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25917
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PARRISH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARRISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59607
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PARRISH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parrish vs Saul
as 1:2019cv05628
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parrish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parrish, Kenneth v. McCulloch, Deborah et al
as 3:2012cv00750
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parrish
Defendant:
Deborah McCulloch and William Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Parrish v. Deborah McCulloch
as 12-1218
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH PARRISH
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH MCCULLOCH
Parrish v. McCulloch
as 2:2011cv00419
Petitioner:
Kenneth Parrish
Respondent:
Deborah McCulloch and Byran Bartow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish v. Kremers
as 2:2011cv00356
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parrish
Defendant:
Jeffrey Kremers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Norberg et al
as 1:2009cv00456
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parrish
Defendant:
Wendy Norberg, Steve Schneider, David Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
