Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SOWELL et al v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SOWELL and PHILLIP HUDOK
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN ROBERTS, JR, NANCY PELOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Sowell v. Barber
as 22-20060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark A. Barber, doctor, the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections, Betty J. Williams, Doctor for the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections, Ramon Saucedo, Doctor for the State of Texas at the Texas Department of Corrections and others
Sowell v. Estelle Med Dept
as 21-20603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Defendant / Appellee:
Estelle Medical Department
Sowell v. Richardson
as 21-20136
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle Northcutt, Captain Hill, H. M. Pederson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Kenneth Sowell v. Mark Barber, et al
as 20-20519
Defendant / Appellee:
Niya W. Collins, John Doe, nurse, Chancy Sessions and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Sowell v. Estelle Medical Department
as 4:2020cv03114
Defendant:
Estelle Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sowell v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2020cv01492
Defendant:
Estelle Medical Department and Texs Department of Criminal Justice
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sowell v. Barber et al
as 4:2018cv04499
Defendant:
Betty J Williams, Ramon Saucedo, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sowell v. City of Rowlett Texas et al
as 3:2017cv00307
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kenneth Sowell
Defendant:
City of Rowlett Texas , Jeff Carey, Chance Fleck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Sowell v. Christopher Kyle, et al
as 11-10114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH SOWELL, also known as Kenneth Sowell
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. KYLE, GAYLORD R. THOMPSON, STEPHEN A. ORTEGA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
