Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jones v. Orchid Underwriters Agency, LLC
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Jones
Defendant:
Orchid Underwriters Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rosales Ortega Alvaro v. Pittman Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03856
Plaintiff:
Rosales Ortega Alvaro
Defendant:
Pittman Trucking, Inc. and Kenneth W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rosales Ortega Alvaro v. Pittman Trucking, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Rosales Ortega Alvaro
Defendant:
Pittman Trucking, Inc., Kenneth W. Jones and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kenneth Jones v. USA, et al
as 21-5302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth W. Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States District Court, United States Department of Justice and others
Elec Employees Pension Fund v. Mark Tonnesen
as 15-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PHILLIPS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK K. TONNESEN and KENNETH W. JONES
Defendant:
TRIAD GUARANTY, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4409
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01546
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGE, CLIFFORD WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Midland Credit Management, Inc
as 12-3304
Petitioner:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Respondent:
Kenneth W. Jones, o/b/o himself and all others similarly situated
Jones v. Midland Funding LLC
as 12-1699
Petitioner:
Midland Funding LLC and Midland Credit Mgmt, Incorporated
Respondent:
Kenneth W. Jones, 0/b/0 himself and all others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
