Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02603
Plaintiff:
Kent Adams
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Rose v. Darden et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Tony Darden, Cris Desmond, Angela Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02876
Petitioner:
Kent Bell
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxey v. New Kent Circuit Court et al
as 1:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
Robert S. Maxey, Jr.
Respondent:
New Kent Circuit Court and VA D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv01450
Petitioner:
Kent M. Bell
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez-Figueroa v. Borne et al
as 5:2023ct03129
Plaintiff:
Santiago Rodriguez-Figueroa
Defendant:
Sgt. R. Borne, C/O Moneymaker, C/O Deane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03381
Petitioner:
Kent Bell
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copeland v. USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00499
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dewayne Copeland and Kent D. Copeland
Respondent:
Warden USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv00675
Petitioner:
Kent Bell
Defendant:
Warden Gregory A. Werner
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
