Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ali et al v. Brink et al
as 8:2020cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Reed Ali and Mi'Te Pharu El
Defendant:
M&T Bank, Kevin J. Pearson, SouthLaw P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ali et al v. Brink et al
as 8:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Reed Ali and Mi'Te Pharu El
Defendant:
M&T Bank, Kevin J. Pearson, SouthLaw P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Palmer et al v. A Plus Trucking, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Shelly L. Lanz, Tanraj Singh Bookher, Garry Mercer Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Palmer and Christina S. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2018cv00322
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Bates
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Yale v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00264
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Yale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hayes et al v. Heineman et al.
as 4:2011cv03229
Plaintiff:
Matthew Adams, Eric J. Aho, Jr., Cynthia Alberico and others
Defendant:
Carlos Castillo, Dave Heineman, Shane Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yale v. USA
as 8:2011cv00407
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Yale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Malcom v. Houston
as 4:2004cv03243
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke, Robert Houston and Michael Kenney
402) 444-6787 (fax:
Jeffrey J. Lux
Petitioner:
Arven Malcom, Jr.
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
402) 471-3591 (fax:
Kevin J. Slimp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yale v. United States of America
as 8:2008cv00050
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Yale
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
