Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 465
Vazquez v. Nielsen, et al.
as 23-3610
Plaintiff / Appellant: TONETTE VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee: KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration), Agency and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration)
Pars Equality Center et al v. Pompeo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv07818
Defendant: U.S Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff: Jane Doe # 1, Nicholas Hanout, Afshin Raghebi and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15283
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15324
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 21-55941
Plaintiff / Appellee: FAOUR ABDALLAH FRAIHAT, MARCO MONTOYA AMAYA, RAUL ALCOCER CHAVEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Saleh Shaiban v. Mark Koumans
as 21-2010
Plaintiff / Appellant: SALEH SHAIBAN
Defendant / Appellee: MARK KOUMANS, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, substituted for predecessor L. Francis Cissna, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, substituted for predecessor Kirstjen Nielsen and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV
as 20-1311
Plaintiff / Appellee: SAMIR ANWAR, WAEL HAKMEH, MURAT FRLJUCKIE and others
Defendant / Appellant: KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection in his official capacity, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, in his official capacity, NICHOLAS J. RASMUSSEN, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE, CATO INSTITUTE, FRED T. KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW & EQUALITY and others
Not Yet Classified: ALAN MICHAEL MYGATT-TAUBER
State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00068
Defendant: United States of America , Kirstjen M. Nielsen , Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff: State of Texas , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor_defendant: Karla Perez , Maria Rocha , Jose Magana-Salgado and others
Movant: State of New Jersey
Amicu: U.S. Rep. Steve King, et al.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Estime v. McAleenan, et al
as 9:2021cv80020
Defendant: KENNETH CUCCINELLI II, male, Act. Sec. Dept. DHS Kevin K McAleenan, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff: Wilguens Estime
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Khattri v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2020cv05953
Respondent: Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Petitioner: PAWAN KHATTRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?