Cases 1 - 10 of 11
THOMPSON v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, KEYES, ASHBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. KEYES et al
as 2:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Defendant:
KEYES, LEFTLER, SIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE, et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. BOURLARD et al
as 2:2021cv00088
Defendant:
KEYES, ROGERS, NICHOLSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALTERS v. BETHEL et al
as 2:2019cv00458
Defendant:
KEYES, PEREZ, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2014cv01845
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. CARTER
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Keyes v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Todd A Keyes
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GS Cleantech Corporation v. Aemetis, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08014
Counter Claimant:
AEMETIS ADVANCED FUELS KEYES, INC. and AEMETIS, INC.
Defendant:
AEMETIS ADVANCED FUELS KEYES, INC. and AEMETIS, INC.
Counter Defendant:
GS CLEANTECH CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
GS CLEANTECH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
