Cases 41 - 50 of 356
KING v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv02425
Plaintiff:
DEONDRAE L. KING
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ACTING WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KING v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv00708
Petitioner:
JEROME KING
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KING v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BARRY KING
Defendant:
DENISE RODRIGUEZ, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE and STEPHANY MCGANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BARRY KING
Defendant:
DENISE RODRIGUEZ, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE and STEPHANY MCGANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. TESLA et al
as 2:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
OLIVER AARON KING
Respondent:
KIM TESLA, MITCHELL SHAHEN, RICHARD MANCINI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. WARDEN BEAVER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Defendant:
OLIVER AARON KING
Respondent:
WARDEN BEAVER COUNTY PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
