Cases 31 - 40 of 918
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant:
Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Via, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6015
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, K. CROSBY, Regional Ombudsman for VDOC, BETH CABELL, Warden of Sussex II State Prison and others
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Silas Thomas King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester King v. John Palmer
as 23-7204
Petitioner / Appellant:
SYLVESTER K. KING
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN PALMER
Jai King v. A. Boyd
as 23-7200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAI ALQUAN KING
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA BOYD, HSA Supervisor, DR. DALE MORENO, LIEUTENANT MONTRELL BEASLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
