Cases 1 - 10 of 450
PRATHER v. HASSLER et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
REGINALD PRATHER
Defendant:
NATHAN HASSLER, JOHN MONTGOMERY, PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv50150
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
Joseph Jennings, Lt. McBride, Andrea Tack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kyle James King
Defendant:
Steven Johnson, Sgt Furgason and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONTGOMERY v. KING et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
KENDALL MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
LYNETTE KING, V. OSBURN, HEFLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Neal v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
London De'shawn Neal
Defendant:
Lt Marcus King and Lt Anthony Matushak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scheurich v. Ford County et al
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
David E Scheurich
Defendant:
Ford County, Ford County Sheriff's Office, Mark Doran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, TRINITY FOOD SERVICES GROUP, H. SOLAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faber v. Siddiqui et al
as 3:2023cv03628
Plaintiff:
Earl Faber
Defendant:
Siddiqui, Doctor King, Dewayne Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
