Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Antonacci v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Mr. Louis B Antonacci and Louis B Antonacci
Defendant:
Rahm Israel Emanuel, Stephen Brett Shapiro, Paul J Kiernan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cunningham v. Headstart Warranty Group, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Headstart Warranty Group, LLC, Vehicle Service Department, Sing for Service, LLC doing business as MEPCO and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clauvens Cenor, Jr. v. Stevie Knight
as 21-7697
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAUVENS CENOR, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden
Respondent:
MELISSA FORSYTH, Camp Administrator
Ricardo Serrano v. Stevie Knight
as 21-7606
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICARDO CRUZ SERRANO
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden
Respondent:
MELISSA FORSYTH, Camp Administrator
Roberto Arce, Jr. v. Stevie Knight
as 21-7601
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO ARCE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden
Respondent:
MELISSA FORSYTH, Camp Administrator
Juan Colon-Arriaga v. Stevie Knight
as 21-7602
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN JOSE COLON-ARRIAGA
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden and MELISSA FORSYTH, Camp Administrator
David Rodriguez v. Stevie Knight
as 21-7597
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVIE KNIGHT, Warden
Respondent:
MELISSA FORSYTH, Camp Administrator
US v. Sam Wallace
as 21-4592
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SAM QUINTON WALLACE, a/k/a Gugang, a/k/a Ronald Knight
Knight v. Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC
as 3:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kristina Knight
Defendant:
Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
