Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Sheffield Korte Joint Venture v. Secretary of the Army
as 24-1134
Appellant:
SHEFFIELD KORTE JOINT VENTURE
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Kyle Korte v. USA
as 21-56355
Petitioner / Appellant:
KYLE JASON KORTE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eugene Korte v. State of California, et al
as 21-16145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUGENE KORTE, DBA EFK Systems
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SOLANO, SOLANO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY and others
Rodney Brown v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-2460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rodney Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Steiger, Phil Harden, John Does, 1-3 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mark Stuart, et al v. City of Scottsdale, et al
as 21-15504
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SMITH, Husband, VIRGINIA KORTE, Wife, SANTAELLA, Wife, named as Jane Doe Santaella and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK STUART, an Individual and Chairman, DBA Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale, DBA Save Our Preserve, Inc.
Plaintiff:
SAVE OUR PRESERVE, INC., an Arizona corporation on behalf of its members and MARGARET STUART, an Individual and Treasurer, DBA Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale
US v. Jason Kort
as 21-4078
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON EDGAR KORT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(PS) Korte v. State of California et al
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, Vacaville Police Department, Solano County Department of Information Technology and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Korte Doing business as EFK Systems
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
KKMB, LLC v. Khader et al
as 1:2020cv03997
Defendant:
Sandra Rabadi, Does 1 through 20, Noura Shoubash and others
Petitioner:
Habersham Funding, LLC
Plaintiff:
KKMB, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
