Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Blue State Refugees et al v. Noem et al
as 3:2021cv03024
Plaintiff:
Blue State Refugees, Luke Robertson and Chad Dollick
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Scott Bollinger, Brent Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SD VOICE, et al v. Kristi Noem, et al
as 21-3195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SD VOICE and Cory Heidelberger
Defendant / Appellant:
Kristi Noem, Governor of South Dakota, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General of South Dakota, in his official capacity and Steve Barnett, Secretary of State of South Dakota, in his official capacity
SD VOICE, et al v. Kristi Noem, et al
as 21-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SD VOICE and Cory Heidelberger
Defendant / Appellee:
Kristi Noem, Governor of South Dakota, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General of South Dakota, in his official capacity and Steve Barnett, Secretary of State of South Dakota, in his official capacity
Planned Parenthood MN, ND, SD, et al v. Kristi Noem, et al
as 21-2922
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Sara A. Traxler, M.D. and Sarah A. Traxler, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Secretary of Health, Department of Health, in her official capacity, Kristi Noem, Governor, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Alpha Center and Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net Pregnancy Resource Center
Planned Parenthood MN, ND, SD, et al v. Alpha Center, et al
as 21-2913
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Sara A. Traxler, M.D. and Sarah A. Traxler, M.D.
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Governor, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General, in his official capacity, Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Secretary of Health, Department of Health, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Alpha Center and Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net Pregnancy Resource Center
Kristi Noem, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 21-2542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Governor Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Dakota and South Dakota
Defendant / Appellee:
Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Shannon A. Estenoz, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Shawn Benge, in his official capacity as acting Director and Deputy Director of Operations of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Appellant:
State of Kansas, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Dakotans for Health v. Kristi Noem, et al
as 21-2428
Defendant / Appellant:
Kristi Noem, South Dakota Governor, in her official capacity, Steve Barnett, South Dakota Secretary of State, in his official capacity and Jason Ravnsborg, South Dakota Attorney General, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dakotans for Health
Noem et al v. Haaland et al
as 3:2021cv03009
Plaintiff:
South Dakota and Governor Kristi Noem
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Herbert Frost, Shawn Benge and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Amicus Curiae:
State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bravo et al v. Pelosi et al
as 6:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bravo, P. P., Lindsey Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Mike Podhorzer, Pete Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. James Terwilliger, et al
as 20-3441
Defendant / Appellant:
James Terwilliger, Secretary of the Department of Revenue of the State of South Dakota and Kristi Noem, Governor of the State of South Dakota, in her official capacity
Defendant:
Richard L. Sattgast, Treasurer of the State of South Dakota
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, a Federally-recognized Indian tribe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
