Cases 1 - 6 of 6
John Gabor, et al v. Rebecca Harris, et al
as 22-35173
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN GABOR and KAY GABOR
Defendant / Appellant:
REBECCA HARRIS and KRISTIN HUMPHREY
Defendant:
MIRIAM CARTER DESHLER, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, LORD & CARTER TRUST & TRUSTEE SERVICES and others
John Gabor et al v. Mariam Carter Deshler et.al.
as 2:2018cv00312
Defendant:
Estate of Miriam Carter Deshler, Miriam Carter Deshler, Rebecca Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Kay Gabor and John Gabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jason Humphrey, et al v. Kim Sapp, et al
as 13-5367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON HUMPHREY, Individually and as next friends of their minor children, LH and MH and KRISTIN HUMPHREY, Individually and as next friends of their minor children, LH and MH
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM SAPP, Social Services Worker, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Community Based Services, in Her Individual and Official Capacity, JAMEY BARTLEY, Supervisor, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department for Community Based Services, in His Individual and Official Capacity and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY CABINET FOR HEALTH & FAMILY SERVICES, Department for Community Based Services
Jason Humphrey, et al v. Kim Sapp, et al
as 10-5543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON HUMPHREY, Individually and as next friends of their minor children, LH and MH and KRISTIN HUMPHREY
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM SAPP
Defendant:
JAMEY BARTLEY and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, CABINET FOR HEALTH & FAMILY SERVICES
Humphrey et al v. Sapp et al
as 3:2009cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jason Humphrey and Kristin Humphrey
Defendant:
Kim Sapp, Jamey Bartley and Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
