Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Teague (PS) v. Kurtenbach et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
David Adam Teague
Defendant:
Angela Kurtenbach, Stephen Giles and Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munger (PS) v. Munger et al
as 1:2023cv03031
Plaintiff:
Paul Munger
Defendant:
Donna Munger, Nick Long, Jacob Kurtenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kurtenbach v. Geico Indemnity Company
as 3:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
James Kurtenbach
Defendant:
Geico Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Settles et al v. Daktronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10793
Plaintiff:
Steve Settles and Dawg Investment Fund, LLC
Defendant:
Daktronics, Inc., Reece A. Kurtenbach and Sheila M. Anderson
Kurtenbach v. JUUL Labs,Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv06163
Plaintiff:
Kane David Kurtenbach
Defendant:
JUUL Labs,Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX Labs, Inc. and PLOOM Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kurtenbach v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv01348
Plaintiff:
Janelle Elizabeth Kurtenbach
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Matthew Kurtenbach v. Hughes County, et al
as 22-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew C. Kurtenbach
Defendant / Appellee:
Hughes County and Reliance Telephone Services
Kurtenbach v. Reliance Telephone Services
as 0:2021cv02376
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kurtenbach
Defendant:
Reliance Telephone Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtenbach v. Schnell et al
as 0:2021cv02378
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kurtenbach
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Tracy Beltz, Jami Doeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtenbach v. City of Shakopee et al
as 0:2021cv02379
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kurtenbach
Defendant:
City of Shakopee, Scott County, Joshua Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
