Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 21-2454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWN LANELLE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, HAROLD KERTES and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Joel Snider v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-8048
Not Yet Classified:
RIVERA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Chief Grievance Coordinator, WAINE and others
Joel Snider v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-1626
Defendant:
TORRENCE STATE HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, COLLINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG SHAFFER, KAREN KASKIE, COUNTY OF UNION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL SNIDER
Not Yet Classified:
VINCENT MOONEY
Snider v. McKeehan et al
as 4:2018cv00801
Plaintiff:
Joel Snider
Defendant:
McKeehan, Nichtman, Jennifer Herrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Kuzar et al
as 3:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Riley
Defendant:
Kuzar, Unknown at This Time, Jennifer Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Huber et al
as 3:2015cv01407
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Huber, Sneck, Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy-Gibson v. Hubber et al
as 3:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCoy-Gibson
Defendant:
A. Hubber, B. McBeth, Cleaveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drummond et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2013cv01891
Plaintiff:
Gerald Drummond and Michael Burkhart
Defendant:
Laurel R. Harry, J. Meintel, T. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
