Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 674
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff: Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant: ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff: James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Leopold v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv03713
Defendant: Genuine Parts Company doing business as NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION also known as NAPA, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Morse TEC, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Debra Leopold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gerads v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2023cv03672
Plaintiff: James Gerads
Defendant: 84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Love et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff: Leonard D. Love and Karen L. Morey
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company, Robinson Insulation Company, Grogan Robinson Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rodriguez, et al v. Oshkosh Corporation et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant: Schneider Electric USA, Inc. formerly known as Square D Company, 3M Company, 84 Lumber Company and others
Plaintiff: Oshkosh Corporation, Kirby Rodriguez and Patricia Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Mohr v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06081
Plaintiff: Raymond Mohr
Defendant: AW Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Crown, Cork & Seal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Dougherty v. Autoliv ASP Inc., et al
as 1:2022cv00976
Plaintiff: Joseph John Dougherty
Defendant: DAP Products, Inc., Donald McKay Smith Inc, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Pneumo Abex LLC, R.E. Kramig & Co., Inc., Red Seal Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bierwirth v. AII Acquisition Corporation, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Defendant: Alan MRO Supply Inc., Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. doing business as Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc. formerly known as Statewide Industrial Equipment Co., Inc., Individually and as Successor by Merger to Sager-Spuck Supply Co., Inc., BW/IP International Co. and others
Plaintiff: Robert Bierwirth and Gloria Bierwirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?