Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Abbey et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11382
Plaintiff:
Maureen Crowe-Freno, Denise A. Harris, Adria Heinrich and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Allison et al United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv01174
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wilson, Billy Davis, Debbie Henry and others
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jones et al v. Apple Inc.
as CAN/5:18-cv-00406
Plaintiff:
Brent Jones , Karen Palmer and Mark Davis
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Jones et al v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
Brent Jones , Karen Palmer and Mark Davis
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05249
Plaintiff:
Karen Palmer
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Palmer v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Karen Palmer
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PALMER v. HAMBURG et al
as 1:2009cv01375
Plaintiff:
KAREN PALMER
Defendant:
MARGARET HAMBURG, JOSHUA SHARFSTEIN, NORRIS ALDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jose Rodriguez, et al v. Gerald Hall, et al
as 09-3799
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ and CARMEN RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
KAREN PALMER
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
GERALD HALL, CITY OF CLEVELAND, ROBERT MILLER and others
Jose Rodriguez, et al v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 09-3679
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ and CARMEN RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
KAREN PALMER
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, RASCO DAVIS, GERALD HALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
