Cases 1 - 10 of 12
O'FERRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
CINDY-MAY O'FERRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blanchard v. U.S. Parole Commission et al
as 3:2022cv50067
Petitioner:
Antonio Blanchard
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission and Karl Racine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2018cv01158
Defendant:
WENDY POHLHAUS, LESLIE PARSONS, CHANNING PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MONROE-RICKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
VICKY MONROE-RICKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jim Navarro v. USA, et al
as 17-10468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Navarro v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
USA, State of Colorado, The, State of Illinois, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America, The State of Colorado, The State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
