Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Procopio-Bey v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv00782
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Division of Child Support Services, Arizona Department of Economic Security and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Procopio-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Procopio-Bey v. Arizona Division of Child Support Services et al
as 2:2020cv02061
Defendant:
Arizona Division of Child Support Services, Arizona Department of Economic Security, Elizabeth Brandt and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Procopio-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Radomski v. Parrot et al
as 2:2017cv00852
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Radomski
Defendant:
Andrew Parrot, Karrie Candler and Unknown Quon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson et al v. Ameriprise Home and Auto Insurance et al
as 2:2016cv01614
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Richardson and Marc Richardson
Defendant:
Ameriprise Insurance Company , IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company , Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01565
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Davis v. Yazzie et al
as 2:2012cv02262
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Yazzie, Unknown Smith and Unknown Karris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond et al v. NETCO Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ty Richmond and Karrie Richmond
Defendant:
NETCO Incorporated, Lender Processing Services Incorporated , T.D. Service Company of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv08229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
