Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TURNER-PAYNE v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2020cv04224
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN TURNER- PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bukowski v. Spinner
as 17-3882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joyelle Bukowski
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Jeffrey A. Spinner, Judge Matthew Hughes, Mary Beth Daniels and others
Bukowski v. Spinner et al
as 2:2017cv06693
Defendant:
Dennis M. Brown, Philip Castrovinci, Mary Beth Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Joyelle Bukowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bukowski v. Spinner et al
as 1:2017cv08138
Plaintiff:
Joyelle Bukowski
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Spinner, Matthew Hughes, Mary Beth Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bukowski v. Spinner
as 17-1658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joyelle Bukowski
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeffrey Arlen Spinner, Family Judge, Court of State of New York, Mary Beth Daniels, Law Guardian, Joanne Merrihue and others
Bukowski v. Spinner et al
as 2:2017cv00845
Defendant:
Dennis M. Brown, Philip J. Castrovinci, Mary Beth Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Joyelle Bukowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv00263
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kathleen Turner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
