Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr
Defendant:
Ms. Kathy Davis, Mr. Wayne Rickman, Mr. David Bosserman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Goyla et al
as 3:2021cv00345
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
J Ray Goyla, Matt Rianstro, Harvey Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maughan v. Burnham et al
as 2:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Ryan Darley Maughan
Defendant:
Bruce O. Burnham, Utah Department of Corrections, Kathy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Bowersox et al
as 6:2012cv03478
Plaintiff:
Nemi Harris
Defendant:
Michael Bowersox, Terrena Ballinger, Gregory Markway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Davis
as 2:2011cv04276
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Washington
Defendant:
Kathy Davis
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perryman v. Bell et al
as 2:2011cv04024
Plaintiff:
Lysander Perryman
Defendant:
William Bell, Kathy Davis and Birmingham, City of
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perryman v. Davis et al
as 2:2011cv03965
Petitioner:
Lysander Perryman
Respondent:
Kathy Davis and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washington v. Davis et al
as 2:2011cv03914
Petitioner:
Lawrence Washington
Respondent:
Kathy Davis and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
James Conrad Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Kathy Davis, Scott L Downing, Richard N Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipsey v. Langford et al
as 2:2009cv00458
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Lipsey
Defendant:
Larry Langford, Birmingham City Council, A C Roper and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
