Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harper v. Dillon et al
as 2:2013cv25077
Plaintiff:
Cedeal Harper
Defendant:
Kathy Dillon, David Ballard, Ralph Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Smitty Harding
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Cecelia Janiszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molineaux v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv03490
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Molineaux, Jr.
Defendant:
David Ballard, Jim Rubenstein, Wexford Health Sources Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buzzard v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv06376
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
David Ballard, Teresa Gregory, Lisa Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medicus Insurance Company v. Pellegrini et al
as 3:2015cv06015
Plaintiff:
Medicus Insurance Company
Defendant:
John Pellegrini, PMP Services, LTD, Hope Clinic PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Faruq v. Steele et al
as 4:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Khalifah Abd-Al Mubaymin Faruq
Defendant:
Troy Steele, Tamie Crumble, Fred Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Records et al
as 2:2012cv00707
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Records and Kathy Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pannell v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA et al
as 2:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
Richard Pannell
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, James C. Bodday and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Miller et al
as 2:2008cv00814
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Jessica Miller, Brian Greenwood, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
