Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Wakelyn v. Koplinski et al
as 2:2013cv00218
Plaintiff:
Noel Thomas Wakelyn , Jr.
Defendant:
John R Koplinski, 10 Unnamed John and Jane Does, David Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Kuplinski et al
as 3:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Moore
Defendant:
John R. Kuplinski, John Doe 1-10, Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue
as 12-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARTOLA J. PACETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration and MARY HOLT
Defendant:
MARK S. MILLARD, Judge, ALAN CARLSON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Bartola Pacetti v. Mark Millard
as 12-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARTOLA J. PACETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARK S. MILLARD, Judge and ALAN CARLSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, MARY HOLT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Bartola Pacetti v. Michael Astrue
as 12-1461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARTOLA J. PACETTI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration and MARY HOLT
Defendant:
MARK S. MILLARD, Judge, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA and others
Pacetti v. Millard et al
as 1:2011cv01293
Plaintiff:
Bartola J. Pacetti
Defendant:
Mark S. Millard, Alan Carlson, Michael J. Astrue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Banks v. Kuplinkski et al
as 1:2008cv01175
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamont Banks
Defendant:
John R. Kuplinkski, Ionesoi, Kathy Ricci and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ricci et al v. Superior Moving & Storage, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00274
Plaintiff:
Pasquale Ricci and Kathy Ricci
Defendant:
Superior Moving & Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
