Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Yu v. New Orleans Asylum Office
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Kai Yu
Defendant:
New Orleans Asylum Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yu-Godel v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2022cv02295
Plaintiff:
Kay Yu-Godel
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Huang v. Holder
as 12-3543
Petitioner:
Kai Yu Huang, AKA Kaiyu Huang
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Liao v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv02494
Plaintiff:
Wanxia Liao
Defendant:
United States of America, US Department of Justice, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liao v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv02494
Plaintiff:
Wanxia Liao
Defendant:
United States of America , US Department of Justice, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liao v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv02494
Plaintiff:
Wanxia Liao
Defendant:
United States of America , US Department of Justice, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yu et al v. Town of Southold et al
as 1:2010cv02943
Defendant:
Board of Trustees, Chief Carlisle Cochran, Jill M. Doherty and others
Justice:
Rudolph H. Bruer
Plaintiff:
Cheng Kai Yu Revocable Trust, Cheng Kai Yu and Hui Hui Yu
Bay Constable:
Andrew C. Epple, Jr.
Trustee:
James King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Liao v. Ashcroft et al
as 4:2008cv02776
Plaintiff:
Wanxia Liao
Defendant:
Kay Yu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wanxia Liao v. John Ashcroft, et al
as 09-15667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WANXIA LIAO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ASHCROFT, ALBERTO GONZALES, KEVIN CALLAHAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
