Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Keeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Keeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Keeley Hamilton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-1466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEELEY HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Summons v. Keeley
as 1:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Kyle Javan Summons
Defendant:
Rachel E. Keeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clendenin v. Keeley et al
as 1:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Shane Clendenin
Defendant:
Rachel Keeley, Chad Hunt and Mike Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01970
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Keeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Keeley v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Christopher Keeley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keeley v. Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund et al
as 2:2022cv10149
Plaintiff:
Randy J Keeley
Defendant:
Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund and Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hamilton v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv10066
Plaintiff:
Keeley Hamilton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Keeley et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05580
Plaintiff:
William J Keeley and Christina Dangerfield
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Social Security Commissioner
as 2:2020cv11033
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Keeley Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
