Cases 1 - 10 of 633
Gibas v. Houghton
as 1:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
Susan Marie Gibas
Respondent:
Keith J. Houghton
HOWARD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00412
Petitioner:
BYRON KEITH HOWARD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McNeill v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith McNeill
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Ferguson v. Credit One LLC
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Ferguson
Defendant:
Credit One LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopkins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rosie Hopkins
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Department of Health and Human Service Health Care Registry, Villages of Apex Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ben E. Keith Company v. Thompson et al
as 5:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BEN E. KEITH COMPANY
Defendant:
Jeremy K Thompson and Cheney Bros., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cureton v. Unnamed Defendant et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Cureton
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Lower Bed Unit Restrictive Housing Officers, FNU Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03058
Plaintiff:
Keith Cureton
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Lower Bed Unit Restrictive Housing Officers, Ms. Sergeant Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. USA
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Keith Antonio Barnett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
