Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jermaine Keith Walker v. Faith Elizabeth Basker
as 17-7051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE KEITH WALKER
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM IMAN WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FAITH ELIZABETH BASKER, DAVID SCOTT LAUNDRY, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA and others
Jermaine Keith Walker v. Faith Elizabeth Basker
as 17-6159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE KEITH WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
FAITH ELIZABETH BASKER and CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Jermaine Keith Walker v. David Scott Laundry
as 17-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE KEITH WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SCOTT LAUNDRY, Individual and CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Municiple
Walker v. Basker et al
as 3:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Keith Walker
Respondent:
Faith Elizabeth Basker and Chesterfield Juvenile Domestic Relations Court
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Walker v. Laundry et al
as 3:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Keith Walker
Defendant:
David Scott Laundry and Chesterfield County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Basker et al
as 3:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Keith Walker and Malcolm Iman Walker
Defendant:
Faith Elizabeth Basker, David Scott Laundry, Chesterfield County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Basker
as 3:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Keith Walker
Defendant:
Faith Elizabeth Basker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Walker v. SunTrust Bank
as 3:2014cv00773
Plaintiff:
J. Keith Walker
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker et al v. Marulanda
as 3:2013cv00336
Plaintiff:
J. Keith Walker and CMG Inc. Financial Group Incorporated
Defendant:
Alejandro J. Marulanda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Walker v. Triple T Express Inc
as 3:2012cv02784
Plaintiff:
Roger Keith Walker
Defendant:
Triple T Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
