Cases 1 - 10 of 504
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Massey v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Massey
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sarah Jones, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
KELLEY M. BEAUCHAMP v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
KELLEY M BEAUCHAMP
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marleis Trover v. Craig Oglesby, et al
as 24-1733
Plaintiff:
MARLEIS TROVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of DONALD D. GADDIS
Defendant:
CRAIG OGLESBY and DUSTIN KELLEY
Virgil Kelley v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1587
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL L. KELLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Johnston v. Big Daddy Cab Company et al
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Big Daddy Cab Company, THC Cab Company, Cue Cab Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mosley v. CCC Center of Correctional Concern et al
as 1:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
CCC Center of Correctional Concern, Well Path and Mike Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Echelberger v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Jared Echelberger
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Echelberger v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
Jared Echelberger
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Sarah Kerley, Erin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gabrys v. Will County et al
as 1:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
Richard Gabrys
Defendant:
Will County, Will County Sheriff's Office, Mike Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
