Cases 31 - 40 of 84
USA v. Leopard
as 1:2016cv02459
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Philip Kelly Leopard
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Palma v. United States et al
as 4:2016cv02607
Plaintiff:
Michael-Francis Palma
Defendant:
United States, Internal Revenue Commissioner, Internal Revenue Small Business/Self Employed Division and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
United States of America v. Davis
as 4:2016cv00773
Respondent:
Kelly Davis
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Kelly v. Cathey et al
as 5:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Neil Kelly
Defendant:
Diana C. Cathey, Ivory Jones, Estate of Thomas A. Jones, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America v. Felix Kelly Prakasam et al
as 2:2016cv00137
Defendant:
Citizens Business Bank, Santiago Gomez, Honeywest Finance Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KELLY et al
as 1:2015cv08068
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANNE M. KELLY, AKGG LLC, ANTHONY J. GIAMPIETRO and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kelly
as 2:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Michael E. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Kelly v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2015cv00184
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Brendan F. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Single Ply International, Inc. et al v. Mayer et al
as 4:2015cv10514
Plaintiff:
Single Ply International, Inc. , Single Ply Solutions, Inc. , James D. Black and others
Defendant:
Rebecca Mayer and United States America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Snow Mountain Holdings Trust et al v. Wray et al
as 1:2015cv00221
Plaintiff:
Snow Mountain Holdings Trust and Kelly Leopard
Defendant:
Ginger L. Wray and John Koskinen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
