Cases 21 - 30 of 164
Kelly v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Kelly
Defendant:
State of Missouri and Judge William J Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Blitz et al
as 4:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ira B. Harris
Defendant:
Robert D. Blitz and Kelly Farrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Mikela Jackson and Jean Kelly
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Chief James B. McMillan, Josh S. Golightly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00848
Plaintiff:
Mikela Jackson and Jean Kelly
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Chief James B. McMillan, Josh S. Golightly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailing v. Morriss
as 6:2022cv03200
Petitioner:
Eric Z Dailing
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rauch v. Precythe et al
as 5:2022cv06085
Plaintiff:
Mike Rauch
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Jeff Norman, Christopher Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Oesch
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rickie Joe Kelly and Rickie Joe Hampton
Defendant:
Amanda Oesch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stark v. Morriss
as 6:2022cv03099
Petitioner:
Brandon W Stark
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
El v. Hale et al
as 4:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Nizza P. El and Orlando Preston
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Hale, Officer Unknown Shane, Kim Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Morriss
as 2:2022cv04009
Plaintiff:
James A Riggs
Defendant:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
