Cases 31 - 40 of 510
Walker v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02232
Petitioner:
Larry Walker
Respondent:
Lynn Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burghart v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02225
Petitioner:
Bobby Burghart
Respondent:
L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023ct03279
Plaintiff:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, L.B. Kelly and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GIBSON et al v. STROUD et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON GIBSON and MICHELLE P. GIBSON
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Thomas v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02207
Petitioner:
Daimean Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drayer v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
Kelly Drayer
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
KELLY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00716
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER ANTONIO KELLY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gale v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023ct03237
Plaintiff:
Brian Gale
Defendant:
Lyn B. Kelly and C. Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Soto v. Town of Rolesville et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Defendant:
Town of Rolesville Board of Commissioners, Town of Rolesville, Town Council and others
Plaintiff:
Orlando Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
