Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Rios v. Lubbock County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, Chekota Parker, Bill De Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Garza et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
David W. Brooks
Defendant:
Officer NFN Garza, Corporal NFN Ruiz, Kelly Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Troy Kirk
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, FNU Deleon, K. Balawejder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mongeau v. Rowe
as 5:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Steven Gerard Mongeau
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Weinert v. Rowe
as 23-10336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Lubbock County Sheriff Department, Ken Paxton, State of Texas Attorney General and K. Sunshine Stanek, Lubbock County District Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Tiner v. Abbott et al
as 5:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tiner
Defendant:
Governor Greg Abbott, Sheriff Kelly Rowe, NFN NLN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wojtowicz v. Sheriff, Lubbock County
as 5:2023cv00023
Petitioner:
Donn Wojtowicz
Respondent:
Sheriff, Lubbock County and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Westbrook v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Billy Westbrook
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Sgt. NFN Taylor and Sgt. NFN Sasin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Rowe
as 5:2022cv00283
Petitioner:
Marlon Bailey
Respondent:
Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
