Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. USP Chicago, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv16817
Plaintiff: KENNEDIE JONES
Defendant: USP Chicago, Inc., SILVER CROSS AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER LLC, SILVER CROSS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jones v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv06607
Plaintiff: Kennedy Jones
Defendant: Chicago Police Dept., Lopez, A.J. Poslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cermack Health Services
as 1:2017cv07504
Plaintiff: Kennedy Jones
Defendant: Cermack Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Lentz et al
as 1:2011cv01646
Plaintiff: Edward Henderson
Defendant: Martin Lentz, Paul Crawford, Christopher Randolph and others
Petitioner: Robert C. McClelland
Interested Party: Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-11239
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2885
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones et al v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv01239
Plaintiff: Kennedy Jones and Elaine C Jones
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00638
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00639
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States Of America v. Jones
as 1:2007cv01244
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: Kennedy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?