Cases 1 - 10 of 65
GILES v. BNC BANCORP et al
as 1:2017cv00482
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILES
Defendant:
BNC BANCORP , THOMAS R SLOAN , JAMES T BOLT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Thompson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00339
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Kennedy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copeland v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2014cv00622
Plaintiff:
A. J. Copeland
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
A. Copeland v. Raymond Lane, et al
as 13-16251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A. J. COPELAND, individually and derivatively on behalf of Hewlett-Packard Company
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. LANE, GARY REINER, LEO APOTHEKER and others
Weissmann v. Apotheker et al
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Senta Weissmann
Defendant:
Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Catherine A. Lesjak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morrical v. Whitman et al
as 3:2012cv06434
Plaintiff:
Stanley Morrical
Defendant:
Margaret C. Whitman, Leo Apotheker, Raymond J. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
San Jose Division the City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. Leo Apotheker, et al
as 5:2012cv06416
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard Company, Leo Apotheker, Michael Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Lustig v. Whitman et al
as 5:2012cv06410
Plaintiff:
Karyn Lustig
Defendant:
Margaret C. Whitman, Marc L Andreessen, Shumeet Banerji and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Tola v. Lynch et al
as 4:2012cv06423
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tola
Defendant:
Michael R Lynch, Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
