Cases 41 - 50 of 236
GIMENEZ v. CAMERON et al
as 5:2014cv06255
Petitioner:
MIGUEL A. GIMENEZ
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRICE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2014cv00230
Plaintiff:
CURTIS PRICE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, KENNETH CAMERON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2014cv05531
Petitioner:
HOWARD MILLER
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KIM v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2014cv05320
Petitioner:
KEN KIM
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON and WILLIAM REESE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKE v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
TYRONE D. BURKE
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON and MRS. NOEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynie v. Cameron
as 3:2014cv03025
Plaintiff:
Robert Haynie
Defendant:
Kenneth Cameron, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Appleyard v. Cameron et al
as 3:2014cv01429
Petitioner:
Thomas Appleyard
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SILLICK v. SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SILLICK
Defendant:
SCI HOUTZDALE and KENNETH CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
